Site blog

Anyone in the world

Written by Dr Toni Hazell

It wasn’t what I wanted in my stocking as a child, but as a full-blown contraception nerd, I’m excited at the December 2025 launch of the new UK Medical Eligibility Criteria for contraceptive use (UKMEC)1. Published by the College of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare (CoSRH), formerly the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare, the UKMEC is the gold-standard document on contraceptive safety. 

Before getting into the changes, there are some important basics to remember: 

  • The UKMEC is about safety, not efficacy, although the document does include an efficacy table (figure 1). 
  • Methods are categorised from 1-4, as per figure 2. 1 and 4 are simple – no problem to use or absolutely contraindicated respectively; it’s in the 2s and 3s that your clinical judgment will be important. 
  • The UKMEC is one place where 2 + 2 ≠ 4. Two category 2s doesn’t automatically mean an absolute contraindication, but if they are both in the same area, it does signal a cumulative risk and the need for caution. More than one category 3 ‘may pose an unacceptable risk’.1
  • Some methods have different numbers for initiation or continuation, reflecting the different risks attached to starting a method or continuing one that is already being used. 
  • If a condition isn’t covered in the UKMEC, that doesn’t necessarily mean that all contraception is safe for use.  Consider seeking advice from secondary care, or, if you are a CoSRH member, submit an evidence request to their Clinical Effectiveness Unit and they will summarise the available evidence for you to use alongside your clinical judgment.2
  • The UKMEC is intended to be applied only to contraceptive use. If a woman is getting an extra benefit from her method (for example the management of endometriosis), that may affect your risk/benefit calculation.

Table showing percentage of women experiencing a unintended pregnancy in relation to contraception use.

 

Table of UKMEC efficacy

Figure 2 - Recreation of Definition of UKMEC categories

The key changes are summarised in figure 3.

Topic(s)

Key change

Chronic kidney disease.

Multiple sclerosis.

 

  • Added as new topics – discussed in more detail below.

Use of e-cigarettes.

Sickle cell trait.

  • Added, but there is insufficient data to give UKMEC ratings for sickle trait or the use of e-cigarettes.
  • In both cases, alternatives to combined hormonal contraception (CHC) should be prioritised, due to an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and cardiovascular disease respectively.

Multiple category changes for the depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) injection.

  • Five observational studies have changed our thinking on DMPA, which we now know to increase the risk of VTE. 
  • DMPA still has a lower VTE risk than combined hormonal contraception (CHC), and the absolute number of extra cases is small, but the risk is higher than with other progestogen only methods.
  • Figure 4 shows the changes in DMPA category which relate to VTE risk. For many of these methods, some or all of the progestogen-only alternatives now have a lower risk category than DMPA.

Depression and anxiety

  • Previous UKMEC 1 ratings replaced with a statement about the effects of hormonal contraception in those with anxiety or mood disorders.
  • Discussed in more detail below.

Stroke

  • Three observational studies have shown to increased risk of stroke with the levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG-IUD).
  • Use of the LNG-IUD after a stroke is now a UKMEC 2 (continuation after a stroke was previously UKMEC 3) – for those who have a stroke whilst using a LNG-IUD, changing their contraceptive method can now be one less thing to worry about.   

Breast cancer

  • Clarification of the meaning of ‘current treatment’ for breast cancer – this includes systemic treatment such as tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors.

Human papilloma virus and sexually transmitted infections.

  • Inclusion of those with high-risk human papilloma virus, for whom the LNG-IUD, depot and CHC are now a UKMEC 2.
  • The addition of Mycoplasma genitalium as an STI to be considered when contemplating intrauterine device insertion.

HIV

  • A change towards person-centred language (i.e. clinically well/unwell and on/not on treatment) instead of the use of CD4 counts for those with HIV.

Hypertension

  • Updates to the hypertension criteria to match NICE classification.

Multiple risk factors for VTE and CVD

  • These are two separate sections – only the one for VTE risk factors has been updated.
  • Discussed in more detail below.

 

Table of conditions showing previous and new category DMPA.

Chronic Kidney Disease

Regarding CKD, only the most seriously affected are included – patients who either have nephrotic syndrome or are on dialysis. This cohort should not use CHC (due to VTE risk), and DMPA is now UKMEC 3. This is because DMPA is associated with a small loss in bone mineral density, reversible on stopping3 and those with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are already at risk of osteoporosis4. All other methods are a UKMEC 2. 

Multiple sclerosis

The risk from MS is mainly to do with immobility as a risk factor for VTE, so most methods are a UKMEC 1 for those without prolonged immobility, the exception being DMPA, which is a 2, because those with MS have a greater risk of fracture than the greater population. With prolonged immobility, DMPA remains a 2 and CHC is a 3. 

When prescribing hormonal contraception, it is common to be asked about whether it will cause mood changes. Mood alteration is listed as a common or very common side-effect in the BNF for some combined and progestogen only methods5,6,7 but depression was listed in the previous UKMEC as a category 1. It has been removed from this edition as a category and replaced with a  statement about the effects of hormonal contraception in those with anxiety or mood disorders.

The key points are as follows8

  • There is no clear evidence that any form of hormonal contraception worsens or improves mood. 
  • Most evidence is from observational studies, which often have confounding factors, and do not usually focus on women with pre-existing mental health conditions. 
  • Some patients do report mood change during the use of hormonal contraception; this may not represent direct causation. 
  • Healthcare professionals should explore other possible contributing factors and consider alternative contraception if the patient feels that their mood has been adversely affected by their contraception. 
  • Patients with pre-existing anxiety or depression should monitor their mood when starting hormonal contraception. 

There are two sections on multiple risk factors – one for CVD and one for VTE; the section on multiple risk factors for VTE has been updated in this iteration. The UKMEC signposts to NICE for a full list of risk factors but gives examples which include cancer, inflammatory disorders, recent trauma or surgery and being in the postnatal period. Someone with multiple risk factors for VTE is UKMEC 4 for CHC, 3 for DMPA and 1 for all other methods. 

The UKMEC is a long document; it will take time for the changes to fully bed in, but practices will need to decide how they implement it, particularly for those already using contraception. Reviewing all those using DMPA at the time of their next injection, and everyone else at their annual review would be a good start and hopefully we will all be fully up to date with it long before the next one comes along in a decade or so! 

References

  1. CoSRH. UK Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (UKMEC). Dec 2025. 
  2. CoSRH. Members’ Evidence Request Service.
  3. CoSRH. Progestogen-only Injectable Contraception. July 2023. 
  4. National Osteoporosis Guideline Group UK. Clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. 2024. 
  5. BNF. Ethinylestradiol with levonorgestrel.2025. 
  6. BNF. Desogestrel.2025. 
  7. BNF. Etonogestrel. 2025. 

[ Modified: Tuesday, 3 February 2026, 3:02 PM ]